|
|
The CMA had focused its inquiry on |
โดย : Wagamama เมื่อ 11 ก.พ.64 14:28 น. |
|
|
The CMA had focused its inquiry on “material influence” – which enables it to assert jurisdiction over a deal where there's only a really small minority stake, but where the stake lets the acquirer steer the strategic direction of the business. Normally a stake under 20 per cent is unlikely to meet that criteria, Neill says, but the factors at play made this situation unusual: one, there was a £575m investment, which gives an awful lot of influence. Two, Amazon had gained a seat on the board as part of the deal. Three, Amazon was involved.
อ่านต่อได้ที่ โรงเรียนวัดรางเสน่ห์นครจันทร์
สาระน่ารู้ Corduroy
|
|
|
|
|
|
อ่าน 10843 ตอบ 0 อ่านครั้งสุดท้าย เมื่อ 24 พ.ย.67 15:45 น. |
|
|
|
|
|